This order dismisses an anticipatory bail petition. The court declined bail due to the gravity of the offences alleged (cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust) and the petitioner's history in similar cases.
The applicant was not granted anticipatory bail and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31516 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -229 Year- 2016 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Dharmraj Singh, Son of Late Shiv Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageManhatha, P.S.- Nawanagar, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 09-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31516 of 2016 (2) dt.09-08-2016
2/2
petitioner who had been made accused in the cases of similar nature, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Sections 409, 420, 467, 471/34 IPC.
Whether the nature of accusations and criminal antecedents justify denial of anticipatory bail.
Dharmraj Singh
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
