Allowed

Shashi Bhushan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jul 2016CR. MISC./30071/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in Arms Act case after he spent over six months in custody. Bail was subject to conditions regarding bailee relationship, appearance in court, and constructive cancellation of bail if involved in similar future offenses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties subject to specified conditions.

Shashi Bhushan Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30071 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Sharma, S/o Late Ramchanadra Sharma, R/o Village- Jaya P.S.- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 27-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶3

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.298 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b) a and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶4

Earlier the petitioner has moved before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.6432 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 29.02.2016 rejected the bail of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing six months’ judicial custody.

¶5

The petitioner is in custody since 24.11.2015.

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30071 of 2016 (2) dt.27-07-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

Looking to the period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.298 of 2015, subject to the conditions that:-

¶9

(i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/ wife/son of the petitioner;

¶10

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

¶11

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶12

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶13

pawan/-

¶14

U T

Shashi Bhushan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shashi Bhushan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Radhe Shyam Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramadhar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kumari Sushma Dayal Vs Indradeo Prasad

Ajit Kumar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Jatindra Kumar @ Joni Vs The State Of Bihar