Partly allowed

Ramadhar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jul 2016CR. MISC./28647/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Patna heard a plea for anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 307, 341, 323, 324 and 504/34. The court granted bail to petitioner no.2 on surrender conditions and rejected the plea of petitioner no.1 due to specific injury allegations.

What did the court decide?

Allowed bail to petitioner no.2 on surrender within 4 weeks; rejected bail for petitioner no.1.

Ramadhar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28647 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2016 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ====================================================== 1. Ramadhar Yadav. 2. Satyendra Yadav. Both are Son of Ramdhin Yadav, Resident of Village:- Dharni bigha, P.S.:Pakribrawan, District:- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 26-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶4

In this case, petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Pakribrawan P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 registered for offence under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Both sides are neighbours. The dispute arose on account of drainage. There is case and counter case from both sides. Specific allegation has been made against petitioner no. 1- Ramadhar Yadav to have caused injury by Khanti . There is no specific allegation made against Satyendra Yadav- petitioner no.2.

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28647 of 2016 (2) dt.26-07-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

Looking to facts and circumstances of the case, the Satyendra Yadav-petitioner no. 2, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Pakribrawan P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶9

As there is specific allegation against petitioner no. 1- Ramadhar Yadav to have caused injury by Khanti , his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

¶10

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶11

Mahesh/-

¶12

U T

Ramadhar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramadhar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramjee Paswan and Ors. Vs The Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar University and Ors.

Kharag Kishore Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nanhak Mochi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kishore Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Radhe Shyam Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramashish Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar