Allowed

Satrughan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2016CR. MISC./28788/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting bail to a petitioner accused under Section 392 IPC. The court addressed the petitioner's dispute over police-recovered money alleged to be looted property, crediting the claim of police fabrication. Bail was granted against sureties to the satisfaction of the Local Court.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing security of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate.

Satrughan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28788 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2015 Thana -BHANGWANPUR HAT District- SIWAN ====================================================== Satrughan Singh Son of Banka Singh, Resident of village - Ahirwaliaya, P.S. Manjhagarh, Distt. - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Sufiyan (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 25-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but in course of investigation, he was arrested in connection with another case and his confessional statement was recorded and on the basis of his confessional statement, Rs. 10100/-was recovered from his house. The prosecution claims that the aforesaid recovered amount is looted property of the present case.

¶4

Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the aforesaid recovery is nothing but only the high handedness of

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28788 of 2016 (3) dt.25-07-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

the police and as a matter of fact, the seized amount belongs to the petitioner but with an intention to implicate the petitioner, in the present case, the police claimed that the seized amount was looted property of the present case.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 214 of 2015.

¶9

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)

¶10

Amit/U T

Satrughan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satrughan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Kumar @ Tiger Vs The State Of Bihar

Musmat Anju Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Singh @ Pandey Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Baidya Nath Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar