Allowed

Dinesh Singh @ Pandey Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2016CR. MISC./26192/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving theft, cheating, and offenses under the Arms Act. The court considered the petitioner's employment, lack of criminal record, and claim of ignorance regarding the stolen motorcycles recovered from his premises.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing surety bonds of Rs. 10,000 each to be approved by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad.

Dinesh Singh @ Pandey Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26192 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -110 Year- 2016 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== 1. Dinesh Singh @ Pandey Singh, son of Sri Ramadhar Singh, resident of VillageGangati, Police StationAurangabad (Town), DistrictAurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 22-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶4

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411, 413, 414, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶5

Two stolen motorcycles are said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the aforesaid motorcycles had been purchased by the son of the petitioner and petitioner was not aware of this fact that the aforesaid motorcycles were stolen property. It is further submitted that petitioner is an employee of S.N. Sinha,

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26192 of 2016 (3) dt.22-07-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

Mahavidyalaya, Aurangabad and moreover, petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 110 of 2016.

¶10

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶11

SHAHZAD/-

¶12

U T

Dinesh Singh @ Pandey Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Singh @ Pandey Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Golu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Arshad Ali @ Mhd. Arshad Ali Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kursha Khatoon @ Kuso Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar

Prem Kumar @ Tiger Vs The State Of Bihar