The Single Judge rejected the bail application filed by the petitioner in PS. Case No. 09 of 2015. The court held that recovery of the mobile phone and the petitioner's criminal antecedents precluded granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24055 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2015 Thana -BAJPATTI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== 1. Prem Kumar @ Tiger Son of Yugal Kishore Singh Resident of Village - Bhadai, PS Hathauri District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 22-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385, 387, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration that the mobile used in this case has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and also taking note of this fact that petitioner carries criminal antecedent of several cases of similar nature, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 09 of 2015 pending in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24055 of 2016 (3) dt.22-07-2016
2/2
the court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at
Sitamarhi stands rejected.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
SHAHZAD/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in a case involving offences under Sections 385, 387, 504, and 506 of the IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PREM KUMAR
THE STATE OF BIHAR
HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
