Allowed

Veena Kumari @ Vina Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC30 Aug 2016CR. MISC./27091/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a murder case, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner. The court considered the reliance on a co-accused's confessional statement for recovery and allowed bail upon furnishing appropriate bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

Veena Kumari @ Vina Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27091 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2016 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ====================================================== Veena Kumari @ Vina Kumari Wife of Bikash Kumar Roy Resident of Village - Salampur, P.S. - Amarpur, District - Banka. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 30-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶4

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation, the call details of mobile phone of the petitioner was collected and it came to light that she had sweet relation with one Raushan Kumar. After that Raushan Kumar was arrested and made his confessional statement disclosing this fact that with the help of this petitioner he committed the murder of the deceased. On the basis of confessional statement of co-accused,

¶6

Raushan Kumar, the weapon as well as Dupatta , which had been

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27091 of 2016 (3) dt.30-08-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

used in committing the murder of the deceased, were recovered.

¶10

Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the aforesaid recovery has been made on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Raushan Kumar which cannot be used against the petitioner in evidence and moreover, investigation against the petitioner has already been completed.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2016.

¶12

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶13

SHAHZAD/-

¶14

U T

Veena Kumari @ Vina Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veena Kumari @ Vina Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Upadhyay Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Sah @ Langra @ Binod Kumar @ Langra and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandu Bhosley Vs The State Of Bihar

Amina Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar

Khanna Bhosley and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar