Allowed

Khanna Bhosley and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC30 Aug 2016CR. MISC./22024/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order disposed of two criminal miscellaneous petitions arising from the same police case involving Sections 395 and 397 IPC. The court granted bail to all petitioners, noting their names appeared only in a co-accused's confession and that co-accused with similar allegations had already secured bail.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties of like amount.

Khanna Bhosley and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22024 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2016 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. Khanna Bhosley S/o Surchan Bhosley 2. Laxman Pawar @ Laxman Bhosley @ Laxman Paswan .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.22734 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2016 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== Nandu Bhosley Son of Karapya Bhosley R/o Halkhata Mukain NagarJalgaon PS Kunda distt Malikpur Maharastra. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.22024 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Angad Kunwar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sucheta Yadav(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.22734 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N.Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 5 30-08-2016 Both the above-said petitions arise out of Dhanaura P.S. Case No. 72 of 2016 registered under Sections-395 & 397 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above-said petitions are being heard and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22024 of 2016 (5) dt.30-08-2016

¶4

2/2

¶5

Petitioners are not named in the first information report but from perusal of the impugned order, I find that name of these petitioners surfaced in course of investigation in confessional statement of co-accused and, except aforesaid confessional statement of co-accused, there appears to be nothing against the petitioners. Petitioners are languishing in jail custody since long and, moreover, having more or less similar allegation, some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

¶6

Accordingly, petitioners named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dhanaura P.S. Case No. 72 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi.

¶7

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶8

A.K.V./-

¶9

U T

Khanna Bhosley and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khanna Bhosley and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Upadhyay Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Sah @ Langra @ Binod Kumar @ Langra and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandu Bhosley Vs The State Of Bihar

Amina Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar

Veena Kumari @ Vina Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar