Allowed

Rambriksh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jun 2016CR. MISC./24106/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous petition for bail in Arms Act prosecution. High Court granted bail on ₹25,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including government servant surety, attendance on dates, and no repetition of offenses.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on ₹25,000 with two sureties of like amount each. Conditions: one surety a government servant; no repetition of offenses; regular court attendance.

Rambriksh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24106 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2016 Thana -KAJRA District- LAKHISARAI

¶3

====================================================== Rambriksh Yadav, Son of- Late Mangal Yadav, R/o Village- Champa Nagar, P.S.-Kajra, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajnish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad(APP)

¶4

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 01-06-2016 Heard.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 25(1-B) (a)/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶7

Though the petitioner, besides others, is named in the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1, as an accused, but taking into consideration the fact that no firearm was recovered either from the possession or from the house of the petitioner and further taking into consideration the fact that he is in judicial custody since 05.03.2016, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3^rd Lakhisarai in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No. 7 of 2016 subject to conditions that:

¶8

(A) One of the bailors must be government servant or close family members of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner,

¶9

(B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24106 of 2016 (2) dt.01-06-2016

¶11

2/2

¶12

the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail-bond of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and

¶13

(C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶14

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶15

BTiwary/-

¶16

U T

Rambriksh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambriksh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Uraon Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramashish Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Rinku Parwat Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakhendar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar