Allowed

Guddu Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jun 2016CR. MISC./24057/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal prosecution under the Arms Act. The petitioner, in judicial custody for over a year with no firearm recovered from his possession, was released on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Guddu Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24057 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2015 Thana -PALIGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Guddu Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Son of Sri Amar Singh Resident of Village- Arwal Sipah , PS Arwal, District Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N. Thakur (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 01-06-2016 Heard. The petitioner seeks bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 25(1-B) (a)/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶3

Though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1, as an accused, but taking into consideration the fact that no firearm was recovered from his possession and he has been made an accused in view of disclosure of his name by a coaccused about his involvement in the present case and also taking into consideration the fact that he is in judicial custody since 10.04.2015 i.e. more than one year, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2015 subject to conditions that:

¶4

(A) One of the bailors must be government servant or close family members of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner,

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24057 of 2016 (2) dt.01-06-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail-bond of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and

¶8

(B)

¶9

(C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶10

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶11

BTiwary/-

¶12

U T

Guddu Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Uraon Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramashish Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Rinku Parwat Vs The State Of Bihar

Rambriksh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakhendar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar