Allowed

Ratan Gupta @ Ratan Vijay Gupta @ Ratan Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jul 2016CR. MISC./21443/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single bail order disposing of four criminal miscellaneous applications filed by accused persons in the same police case. The court granted bail despite claims that petitioners were not initially named in the FIR, holding them liable to appear on trial dates with strict conditions regarding bail bond, sureties, and attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the like amount each, subject to the condition of attending trials and filing affidavits by relatives as sureties.

Ratan Gupta @ Ratan Vijay Gupta @ Ratan Kumar Gupta Vs The… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20427 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2015 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== Ritesh @ Ramit @ Amit @ Vikash Chaturvedi @ Vikash, aged about 32 years, Son of Sri Anil Kumar Chaturvedi, Resident of 203/B, Millennium Building, Shastri Park, Goregaon, (West), Mumbai, A/P 117/115 L Block, Navi Nagar, Kakadeo, Kanpur, P.S. Kanpur City, District Kanpur (U.P.).

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

with

¶10

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21443 of 2016

¶11

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2015 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA

¶12

====================================================== Ratan Gupta @ Ratan Vijay Gupta @ Ratan Kumar Gupta, S/o Vijay Kumar Gupta, resident of K- 406, Shri Nand City, Part-5, New Maninagar, C.T.M. Romol, P.S.- Ahmedabad, Disrict- Ahmedabad. (Gujrat).

¶13

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶14

The State of Bihar

¶15

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶16

====================================================== with

¶17

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26838 of 2016

¶18

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2015 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA

¶19

====================================================== Sunil Singh @ Semi @ Sem, S/o Shbharam Singh, R/o 1205, Penekal Deems, P.S.- Nepaniya, District- Indore (M.P.)

¶20

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶21

Versus

¶22

The State of Bihar

¶23

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶24

======================================================

¶25

with

¶26

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27736 of 2016

¶27

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2015 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA

¶28

====================================================== Meraj @ Mehraj Ansari @ Mehraj Amir Ansari, S/o Amir Ansari @ Amir Ahmed Ansari, R/o - Meera Road, flat No. 204, Building No. 11, Shalibhadra Society ,Sayadri Nagar, P.S. Meera Road East, District- Thane (Maharashtra).

¶29

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20427 of 2016 (4) dt.27-07-2016 2/3

¶30

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.20427 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (In Cr.Misc. No.21443 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (In Cr.Misc. No.26838 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (In Cr.Misc. No.27736 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER -------------- 4 27-07-2016 These four applications arise out of the same P.S. Case bearing Budha Colony P.S. Case No.118 of 2015 registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the I.T. Act and, therefore, all these four applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The submission is that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, the police got recorded the confessional statement of the co-accused Sattyam Kumar, who disclosed the name of the petitioners having their hands in withdrawing the cash Rs.9,40,000/- through ATM of Tata Indicase. Further submission is that on the basis of the

¶31

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20427 of 2016 (4) dt.27-07-2016 3/3

¶32

confessional statement of the aforesaid co-accused, the petitioners have been made accused in this case. The petitioners are in custody since 09.10.2015 and the chargesheet has already been submitted against the petitioners.

¶33

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Ritu Kumari, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Patna, in connection with Budha Colony P.S. Case No.118 of 2015. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioners, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. Further, the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners.

¶34

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶35

P.S./-

¶36

U T

Ratan Gupta @ Ratan Vijay Gupta @ Ratan Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratan Gupta @ Ratan Vijay Gupta @ Ratan Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manorama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Kishun Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kumar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Premdhar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhu Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Ritesh @ Ramit @ Amit @ Vikash Chaturvedi @ Vikash Vs The State Of Bihar