Allowed

Sanikant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Apr 2016CR. MISC./12999/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge of Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sanikant Kumar, subject to appearance before trial court after framing of charges and furnishing of bail bonds with family member surety.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail to appear before trial court on date fixed after framing of charges; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Sanikant Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12999 of 2016 (2) dt.13-04-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12999 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -257 Year- 2015 Thana -RAHUI District- NALANDA

¶4

(BIHARSHARIFF)

¶5

====================================================== 1. Sanikant Kumar, S/o Sri Devendra Prasad, aged about 29 years, resident of Village- Anantpur Via Rahui, P.S.- Rahui, P.O- Peshour, DistrictNalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kr.Singh 5(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 13-04-2016 Heard both sides. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rahui P.S. case no. 257 of 2015, registered under Sections 147,149,341,323,307, 504 and 506 of the IPC.

¶6

On going through the First Information Report, it is found that accused persons reached the ‘Darwaja’ of the informant and assaulted the informant and his wife. Specific allegation of assault to the informant and his wife is attributed to co-accuseds Chandan Kumar and Shashikant Kumar. This is also apparent from the impugned order.

¶7

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that both sides are agnates. Petitioner is a young person who does not reside in the village. In respect of the occurrence committed on the date in question, there is another version in the shape of First Information

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12999 of 2016 (2) dt.13-04-2016

¶9

Report lodged by co accused Chandan Kumar (Annexure-4).

¶10

In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Rahui P.S. case no. 257 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with further following conditions:-

¶11

(i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

¶12

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

¶13

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶14

Shyam/-

¶15

U T

Sanikant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanikant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deenanath Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajeev Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad @ Rajindra Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mukesh Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chanderdeo Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar