Allowed

Deenanath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2016CR. MISC./12961/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving charges under the SC/ST Act, Arms Act, and IPC. The court noted that no specific allegation against the petitioner was made under the Arms Act. Bail was subject to conditions including furnishing bonds and appearing before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon arrest/surrender within four weeks, subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and compliance with trial court appearance conditions.

Deenanath Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12961 of 2016 (2) dt.12-04-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12961 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -WARSALIGANJ District- NAWADA ====================================================== 1. Deenanath Yadav Son of Snehi Yadav Resident of village - Nagpur, P.S. Warisaliganj, District - Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat ( Spl.App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 12-04-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ambika Bhagat Spl. P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. case no. 130 of 2015, registered under Sections 341,323,448/34 of the IPC and Section 25(1-B)A, 26,35 of the Arms Act and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act .

¶3

Indisputably, there is no allegation constituting the offence under the Arms Act levelled against the petitioner. It is against the son of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner states with reference to the First Information Report that the caste name of the accused has not been disclosed in the opening lines. It has not been alleged that she belongs to SC/ST caste/community and

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12961 of 2016 (2) dt.12-04-2016

¶5

abused taking her caste name. The allegation is punctuated with malice.

¶6

Mr. Bhagat, Spl. P.P., on the other hand, states that in the FIR , it has been alleged that the petitioner took the name of her caste. In the particular facts of the case where neither her caste status has been stated in the FIR nor it is alleged that by taking caste name she was abused as also the fact that he is not the person who came armed with pistol, this Court is inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶7

Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nawada, in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. case no. 130 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with further following conditions:-

¶8

(i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

¶9

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12961 of 2016 (2) dt.12-04-2016

¶11

such appearance on two consecutive dates, the
trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail
bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in
accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/-
U T

Deenanath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deenanath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjana Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Bishmillah Ansari @ Bismillah Ansari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anand Madhukar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lal Babu Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeev Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad @ Rajindra Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar