Allowed

Rajeev Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2016CR. MISC./12977/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheque dishonour case (Sections 420, 406, 504, 506/34 IPC) after the petitioner disclosed that he had compromised with the informant and paid the admitted dues. The court allowed his surrender and bail following the payment.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail by directing surrender and release within four weeks on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Rajeev Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12977 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2011 Thana -KOTWALI District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. Rajeev Ranjan S/o Sri Ram Prasad, Prop. of Sri Ram Construction, 409/412 Jagat Trade Centre, Fraser Road, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Patna, A/P Resident of 202, Hari Priya Apartment, Road No. 6, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.Kadamkuan, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kr. Jha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER

¶2

2 12-04-2016 Heard both sides.

¶3

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kotwali P.S. case no. 147 of 2011, registered under Sections 420,406,504,506/34 of the IPC.

¶4

A petition was filed by the employee of the petitioner before the Janta Darbar which on transmission was registered as an FIR. Allegation is that for discharging certain work the petitioner issued a cheque which, on presentation, was dishonoured. It is stated that the penal provisions are compoundable. Both the parties have now compromised and certain amounts payable to the informant has been paid by way of

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12977 of 2016 (2) dt.12-04-2016

¶6

2/3

¶7

demand draft. The petitioner had earlier moved for anticipatory bail before the learned Sessions Judge which was disposed of permitting him to surrender. However, the petitioner made efforts and compromised with the informant after paying the acceptable dues.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Kotwali P.S. case no. 147 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with further following conditions:-

¶9

(i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

¶10

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12977 of 2016 (2) dt.12-04-2016

¶12

3/3

¶13

bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in
accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/-
U T

Rajeev Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjana Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Bishmillah Ansari @ Bismillah Ansari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anand Madhukar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lal Babu Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Deenanath Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad @ Rajindra Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar