Disposed

Yogendra Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Apr 2015MJC/519/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same subject matter after providing all subsequent developments. The court allows the new petition within six weeks, ensuring it is decided on merit without prejudice from the prior dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition within six weeks without res judicata applying.

Yogendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.519 of 2015

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14350 of 2006

¶4

====================================================== Yogendra Sharma S/o Late Siyasaran Singh, Resident of Village Balipakar, P.S. Paliganj, District Patna, at present posted as Account Clerk in Tube Well Division, Jehanabad.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Deputy Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. Chief Engineer (South), Tube Well Department, Patna. 5. Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Patna. 6. Superintendent Engineer, Tube Well Circle, Patna.

¶8

Executive Engineer, Tube Well Patna West Division, Patna.

¶9

Executive Engineer, Tube Well, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶10

Executive Engineer, Tube Well, Bihta, Patna.

¶11

... .... Opp. Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1 For the Opp.Party/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-6

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 08-04-2015 Heard the parties.

¶15

The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 14350 of 2006, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution by an order dated 24.11.2014.

¶16

The aforesaid writ petition was filed way back in the year 2006, but all the subsequent developments, which might have taken place during the interregnum period, have not been brought on the record by the petitioner. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that instead of restoring the aforesaid C.W.J.C. No. 14350 of 2006 to its original file, the interest of justice shall be sub-served if the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if cause of action still survives, in the same

¶17

Patna High Court MJC No.519 of 2015 (2) dt.08-04-2015

¶18

2/2

¶19

subject matter after bringing on record all the subsequent developments, which might have taken place during the interregnum period. It is ordered accordingly.

¶20

If such a fresh writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner in the same subject matter within a period of six weeks from today, then the same shall be considered and decided on its own merit without being prejudiced/ influenced by the order dated 24.11.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14350 of 2006 and that shall not be dismissed on the ground of the principles of res judicata.

¶21

The present application stands finally disposed of with the observations and directions made above.

¶22

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶23

BTiwary/-

¶24

Yogendra Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporatio

Vijay Kumar Karwa Vs the Bihar State Test Book Pub.

Sujata Prasad @ Sujata Vs M/S Bharat Petroleum Corporati

Surendra Sahni and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dayanath Jha Vs Shakti Nath Jha and Ors.

Naresh Pd. Vs Naulakhiya Devi