Naresh Pd. v. Naulakhiya Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil RevisionApplication dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2136 of 2011
In
Civil Revision No. 820 of 2010 ====================================================== Naresh Prasad son of Late Balgovind Rao, R/o village Bar Via Hussainganj, P.S.Sherghati, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Naulakhiya Devi W/o Dr.Alakh Niranjan Rao, resident of village Bar Via Hussainganj, P.S. Sherghati, District Gaya .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER -------------- 2 08-04-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present application. Consequently, MJC application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Tahir/-
U
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Naresh Prasad
- respondent
Naulakhiya Devi
Coram
Birendra Prasad Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court