Remanded

Surendra Sahni and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC8 Apr 2015CR. MISC./13587/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the restoration of a rejected criminal revision to its original file and finally disposed of the restoration application. A separate order dismissing the original revision, upholding the high court's earlier stand, is also noted but not further adjudicated in this text.

What did the court decide?

Cr. Revision No.519 of 2012 restored to original file; restoration application disposed of; original revision dismissed without merits.

Surendra Sahni and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13587 of 2015

¶2

¶3

Cr.Revision No.519 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Surendra Sahni 2. Ram Narayan Sahni Both sons of Late Saral Sahni, Resident of village - Bagahi, P.S. Darpa, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Naresh Sahni, Son of Late Kripa Sahni, Resident of village - Bagahi, P.S. Darpa, District - East Champaran .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uma Kant Shukla Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar Mr.Rajesh Ranjan Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party no.1 : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2015 Cr.Misc.No.13587 of 2015 The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for restoration of Cr. Revision No.519 of 2012, which stood rejected on account of non-compliance of the Court’s order dated 29.06.2012 passed by this Bench.

¶4

After having heard the parties and for the reasons disclosed in the present application, the prayer for restoration is allowed. Cr. Revision No.519 of 2012 is restored to its original file.

¶5

The present application stands finally disposed of.

¶6

Cr. Revision No.519 of 2012

¶7

With the consent of the parties, the present matter has been taken up for consideration on merit.

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13587 of 2015 (2) dt.08-04-2015

¶9

¶10

The petitioners have filed the present revision application questioning the validity of the order dated 19.01.2009 passed in Session Trial No.624 of 2006, whereby the prayer made on their behalf for discharging them from the criminal trial in terms of Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

¶11

After having heard the parties, this Court does not find any good ground to interfere with the order dated 19.01.2009 passed by the learned trial court. Accordingly, the present revision application is dismissed.

¶12

However, if the aforesaid trial has not been concluded as yet, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to raise all the pleas, which have been raised in the present petition, during the course of their trial.

¶13

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶14

Arvind/-

¶15

U T

Surendra Sahni and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Sahni and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporatio

Vijay Kumar Karwa Vs the Bihar State Test Book Pub.

Sujata Prasad @ Sujata Vs M/S Bharat Petroleum Corporati

Yogendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dayanath Jha Vs Shakti Nath Jha and Ors.

Naresh Pd. Vs Naulakhiya Devi