The Board has claimed that though the petitioner was ITI in Turner but he got employment on the strength of ITI in Electrical Trade Certificate and he had produced certificate of ITI in Electrical Trade whereas the counsel for the petitioner has disputed the claim of the Board and has drawn attention of this Court to paragraphs 5 and 6 of Annexure-A where it has been mentioned that at the time of joining, the petitioner was required to submit the original certificate and he has asserted that he had produced the original certificate showing him ITI in Turner, accordingly, he was taken in service. The counsel for the petitioner has denied the claim of the Board that he had not produced the original certificate. If he had not produced the original certificate then certainly there should have been some correspondence asking the petitioner to produce the original certificate for verification. As per the claim of the petitioner, the Board has neither produced the original application filed by the petitioner nor any letter has been filed in the affidavit calling upon the petitioner to produce the original certificate. As per the petitioner the show cause vide Memo No. 2871 dated 16th June 1987, was never served upon the petitioner whereas the counsel for the Board has submitted that it was served upon him and when he did not give reply then the Board has passed the order for termination of his service.
