Dismissed
N.T.P.C.Executive Housing Co-O v. the State Bank of India and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/18208/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18208 of 2008
====================================================== N.T.P.C.Executive Housing Co-operative Society, Phase III, Ambedkar Path, Khajpura Patna – 14 through its Ad hoc Secretary Shyam Deo Prasad son of late Satya Narain Prasad, Holder of Flat No. J/301, NTP C Executive kHouse Co-operative, Ambedkar Patha, Khajpura, Patna -14 .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Bank of India through its Managing Director, Industrial Finance Branch, Red Cross Building, North of Gandhi Maidan, Patna 2. The Managing Director, The State Bank of India, Industrial Finance Branch, Red Cross Building, North of Gandhi Maidan, Patna 3. The Chief Manager, Industrial Finance Branch, Patna 4. The Assistant General Manager, Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Rehabilitation and Recovery Branch, 2nd Floor of Patna Main Branch Building, West of Gandhi Maidan, Patna 5. The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Rehabilitation and Recovery Branch, 2nd Floor of Patna Main Branch Building, West of Gandhi Maidan, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhuvaneshwar Prasad, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sharan, Advocate Mr. Hemat Kumar Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
---------------- 3 03-04-2015 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in presence of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties. Therefore, the present matter has become infructuous.
In view of aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Tahir/-
U
N.T.P.C. Executive Housing Co-operative Society, Phase III
The State Bank of India, Industrial Finance Branch
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court