Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The application was granted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order of stay passed on earlier date was vacated.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted and the interim stay order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13638 of 2010 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Basant Yadav S/O Late Manchit Yadav R/O Vill.- Dih Tole (East), P.S.- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani 3. The Additional Collector, Madhubani 4. The Block Development Officer Pandaul, P.S.- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent No. 8 : Mrs.Prabha Singh, Advocate ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER ------------ |
|
| 4 0 |
3-04-2015 Mr.Ashok Kumar Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order of stay dated 20.10.2014 passed by a Bench of this Court stands vacated. |
| (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) | |
| Tahir/- U |
Basant Yadav S/O Late Manchit Yadav
The State of Bihar
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
