Writ petition filed by three plaintiffs against the State of Bihar and officials. Both petitioners and respondents failed to appear. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19562 of 2010
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 02-04-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition. None appears on behalf of the respondents either, though the names of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are printed in the daily cause list. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Arvind/-
U
Akhilesh Prasad, S/O Late Sita Ram Singh
Shyam Babu Singh, S/O Late Sita Ram Singh
Avinash Prasad, S/O Late Sita Ram Singh
The State of Bihar
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
