Partly allowed

Saugato Roy v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 Jan 2015CWJC/15445/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses the writ petition by conditionally disposing of the matter. The court directs the petitioner to file relevant documents proving he is the sole son of the late deceased employee and provide required undertakings, after which due payments must be released.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file documents proving he is the sole son of late Kishore Kumar Roy and provide undertaking; University required to pay due payments within four weeks thereafter.

Saugato Roy Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15445 of 2008

¶2

====================================================== Saugato Roy, aged about 30 years, son of late Kishore Kumar Roy, resident of Mohalla C/O Subir Kumar Roy, Hill View Compound, Near V.C.Resident, Police Station Rampur, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education (Human Resource Development Department), Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. 3 The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. 4. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. 5. The Principal, Gaya College, Gaya, District- Gaya. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s :

¶3

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶4

ORAL ORDER

¶5

5 15-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Magadh University in which the stand is that in absence of petitioner satisfying the authority with regard to being the sole heir of late Kishore Kumar Roy, the payment is withheld. However, learned counsel for the University submits that if the petitioner gives the required undertakings in terms of para 4 of the writ petition in which he has stated that he is the only son of his father late Kishore Kuamr Roy and further statement in para 20 that his mother died in the year 1994 itself; all due payments shall be released in his favour in accordance with law after taking the

¶6

Patna High Court CWJC No.15445 of 2008 (5) dt.15-01-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

required undertaking/surety.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off with a direction to the petitioner to file all relevant documents before the Registrar of the University along with a copy of this order within four weeks from today showing him to be the only son of late employee, namely, Kishore Kumar Roy . He shall also give the required affidavit/undertaking/surety in this regard. Thereafter all due payments shall be paid by the University in favour of the petitioner within the next four weeks.

¶10

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶11

singh/-

¶12

U T

Saugato Roy v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saugato Roy v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Chinta Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Shyam Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Satrudhan Prasad Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Jitendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Vs the Patna Municipal Corporatio