Disposed
Satrudhan Prasad Singh v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/16296/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CWJC No.16296 of 2008 (5) dt.15-01-2015 IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16296 of 2008 (5) dt.15-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16296 of 2008
====================================================== Satrudhan Prasad Singh son of late Shiv Nath Singh, resident of villageMachhagara, P.O. Bhitti Sahabudin, District- Saran(Chapra) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The state of Bihar through Secretary Department of Education, Patna. 3. The Finance Commissioner, Pension Cell, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Superintendent of Education Officer, Saran( Chapra). 5. A.G.,Bihar, Patna, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. 6. The Head Master, Jivdhari High School Dhangaraha, Bariyapyr Chapra (Saran). .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 5 15-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is a common ground at the bar that all admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid, though a little late. In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
singh/-
U T
Satrudhan Prasad Singh
The State of Bihar
Secretary Department of Education Patent
Finance Commissioner Pension Cell
District Superintendent of Education Officer Saran
Head Master Jivdhari High School Dhangaraha
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court