Dismissed

Chinta Devi v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC14 Jan 2015CWJC/10843/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerned delayed pension payments. The court accepted an apology for non-submission of an affidavit, disposed of the application directing payment of dues within 10 days, and granted liberty to file a representation regarding discrepancies in GPF computation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to pay admitted dues without delay; liberty to file representation regarding GPF discrepancy.

Chinta Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10843 of 2011

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chinta Devi Wife of Late Sri Kant Dwivedi, Resident of Road No. 6D, Gardanibagh, Sadhnapuri, Aam Bagicha, P.S.-Gardanibagh, District-Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Joint Secretary General Administration Department, Government of Bihar Patna.

¶9

Director Provident Fund Directorate, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Treasury Officer, Secretariat (Sinchai Bhawan) Patna.

¶11

Account General, Bihar, Patna, Birchand Patel Marg.

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

13. 14.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶16

Pursuant to order dated 13.01.2015, the S.D.O., Narkatiaganj is present in Court and also files a counter affidavit. He has expressed his unconditional and unqualified apology for not responding to the request of the learned State counsel to file an affidavit in the present case. He personally assures the Court that such type of conduct shall not be repeated in future.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid, this Court does not propose to proceed against him.

¶18

Coming to the merits of the case, it has been stated in the counter affidavit filed that the heirs of the

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.10843 of 2011 (13) dt.14-01-2015

¶20

2/3

¶21

deceased are being paid pension and the benefit of the 6^th pay revision has been granted and pay slip issued by the Accountant General, Bihar. He assures that actual payment shall also be made to the petitioner and the difference of the salary and pension arising out of such revision shall also be paid without delay.

¶22

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off with a direction that all admitted dues of the petitioner shall be paid to her without any delay. Whatever required sanction is to be granted by the S.D.O., Narkatiaganj shall be so done within 10 days from today. The Accountant General, Bihar shall issue necessary authority slip within three working days of the sanction letter having been sent by the S.D.O., Narkatiaganj. Thereafter, the S.D.O., Narkatiaganj shall ensure actual payment within the next 10 days.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is some discrepancy in the computation of the G.P.F. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner is given liberty to file a detailed representation before the S.D.O., Narkatiaganj as well as the Assistant Director, G.P.F. Directorate, Patna who shall look into the grievance of the petitioner as raised in her representation and decide the same within three weeks from the date of filing of such representation. If any further payment is required to be made, the same shall also be made to the petitioner within the next

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.10843 of 2011 (13) dt.14-01-2015

¶25

3/3

¶26

two weeks. The personal appearance of the S.D.O., Narkatiaganj stands dispensed with. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U

Chinta Devi v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinta Devi v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Thakur Vs Zila Parisad,Patna and Anr.

Chandra Nand Jha Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Siya Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Singh Vs The State Of Bihar