Rustam Ali and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
N/A
What did the court decide?
Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties.
What the court decided
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9611 of 2015 (2) dt.11-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9611 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHESI District- EAST
CHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
======================================================
1. Rustam Ali Son of Taslim Ansari
2. Chandrika Sah Son of Late Bachu Sah
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar (App)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR
SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
2 11-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
It appears that except confessional statements as well as
criminal antecedent, there is nothing against the petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as
submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Bharti, Judicial Magistrate 1st
Class, Sadar Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Mehshi P.S. Case
No. 298 of 2012.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
SHAHZAD/-
U T
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rustam Ali and Chandrika Sah
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court