Allowed

Rajnish Ranjan @ Anupam v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC11 Aug 2015CR. MISC./7487/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On joint prayer, the mediation centre reported failure to reconcile. The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, conditioning release on surrender within 12 weeks and monthly payments to the wife, subject to matrimonial proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted contingent on surrender within 12 weeks and conditional monthly payments to the wife.

Rajnish Ranjan @ Anupam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7487 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1674 Year- 2013 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajnish Ranjan @ Anupam son of late Dinesh Pandey resident of Mohalla - Maripur, P.S. - Kazi Mohammadpur, District - Muzaffarpur - 842001 presently residing at House No. 523, IInd Floor, Sector -IV, Vaishali, Gaziabad (Uttar Pradesh - 201010).

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Usha Pandey wife of Rajnish Ranjan @ Anupam daughter of Rameshwar Upadhyay presently residing at Village - Majhaulia, P.S. - Majhaulia, District - West Champaran.

¶8

Rameshwar Upadhyay son of Late Rama Kant Upadhayay resident of Village - Majhaulia, P.S. - Majhaulia, District - West Champaran.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kant Mani Tripathi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. H.A.Khan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 11-08-2015 Petitioner being husband of the daughter of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case wherein processes were directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The basic accusation is of torture.

¶13

On the joint prayer of the parties, vide order dated 26.02.2015 the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of the State Legal Services Authority. The report of the Mediator at Flag-X dated 15.07.2015 reflects that in spite of several efforts the dispute could not be resolved through the process of mediation. Though the complainant is still ready to

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7487 of 2015 (5) dt.11-08-2015

¶15

2/3

¶16

resume the conjugal life but somehow or other the petitioner is not agreeing to the offer of the complainant as he feels that his entire family was tortured with frivolous case lodged by the complainant. In the circumstance the reconciliation between the parties does not appear to be feasible at present.

¶17

In the alternative, petitioner is ready to make payment of Rs. 4000/- to the O.P. No. 2 from September, 2015, by depositing the same in the bank account of the O.P. No. 2 by second week of every month. The aforesaid offer is acceptable to the O.P. No. 2 who undertakes to supply the bank account number within a period of two weeks by filing the same on affidavit before learned Court below.

¶18

Considering the stand of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Trial No. 1923 of 2014, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1674(C) of 2013.

¶19

The aforesaid payments will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceeding.

¶20

Three consecutive defaults in making payment will give liberty to the O.P. No. 2 to file appropriate

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7487 of 2015 (5) dt.11-08-2015

¶22

3/3

¶23

application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶24

The present order in no way will preclude

¶25

the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

¶26

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Shageer/-
U T

Rajnish Ranjan @ Anupam v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnish Ranjan @ Anupam v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhpato Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Parwez Alam Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Salim Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Zulfakar @ Zalfakar Jabbar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinod Choudhary @ Vinod Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Bharosh Singh @ Ram Bharosh Singh @ Ram Bharosh Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.