Dismissed

Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Dec 2015CR. MISC./52336/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two criminal miscellaneous applications arising from a bank dacoity case, the Patna High Court rejected the appellants' prayers for bail. The court found the evidence against them compelling and denied release, allowing prayers for renewal if the trial lacks progress within nine months. No precedents were cited in this order.

What did the court decide?

Prayers for bail were rejected. Appellants directed to renew prayer if trial does not make adequate progress within nine months.

Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.51983 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== 1. Fultun Kumar Yadav @ Fultan Kumar Yadav @ Fultun Yadav, Son of Late Omer Yadav, Resident of village- Bishanpur Jichho, P.S. Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.52336 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== 1. Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav son of Sri Kameshwar Pd. Yadav resident of village - Danda Bajar (Fazilpur) P.S. Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.51983 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Nirmala Kumari (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.52336 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janki Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Nath Mishra (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 14-12-2015 Heard the Counsels for the petitioners in support of both the applications and Mr. Uma Nath Mishra, APP for the State. The petitioners of both the applications seek bail in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No. 318 of 2015 registered under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act.

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51983 of 2015 (2) dt.14-12-2015

¶6

2/3

¶7

A bank dacoity was committed on 26.5.2015. The Senior Branch Manager lodged the F.I.R. against 5-6 unknown accused persons. In course of investigation, the police arrested the petitioners. Against Fultan Kumar Yadav (petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 51983 of 2015), the Police found that he was found in possession of SIM card and mobile which was, as per the call details, used in course of commission of the crime. The learned Sessions Judge while rejecting his prayer has dealt with the material available against the petitioners.

¶8

Contention of the petitioners is that the seizure memo does not contain his signature. If he was present there and articles were recovered, in all fairness, his signature ought to have been obtained thereon. He has no criminal antecedent and lodged in jail since 14.6.2015.

¶9

In the case of Mithilesh Yadav (petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 52336 of 2015), the police in course of investigation recorded confessional statement of Ruchi Kumari on 29.5.2015. She inculpated in her statement not only her husband but her father as well. On the basis of the confessional statement, the motorcycle containing blood strain cloths was found behind the house of the petitioner. Huge amount of money was recovered from beneath the fridge kept in the house of the petitioner.

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51983 of 2015 (2) dt.14-12-2015

¶11

3/3

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not persuaded to release them on bail. Their prayer for bail is rejected. They may, however, renew their prayer for the bail if the trial does not record adequate progress within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶13

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶14

Pankaj/U T

Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarvashree Pundra Herbs Vs the Principal Secretary Cum Ch

Anil Kumar Bagaria Vs Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Biscomaun, through the Managing Director and Ors.

Sheo Lal Rai and Anr. Vs Umesh Prasad Yadav and Ors.

Md. Afroz Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chhotu Mandal @ Raju Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Avinash Rai Vs The State Of Bihar