Dismissed

Anil Kumar Bagaria v. Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Biscomaun, through the Managing Director and Ors.

Patna HC11 Dec 2015CWJC/15297/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court held that a writ petition challenging an eviction order against the Bihar State Co-Operative Marketing Union is not maintainable as the Union is not a State under Article 12. The candidate was dismissed, with relief allowed for pursuing remedies in civil court or arbitration.

What did the court decide?

The writ application is dismissed; petitioner may approach Civil Court or Arbitrator.

Anil Kumar Bagaria Vs Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing… — Property and Title | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15297 of 2012

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Anil Kumar Bagaria S/O Late Sita Ram Bagaria Shop No. 13, Ganga Complex Kankarbagh Road, Police Station- Kankarbagh, District- Patna

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus 1. Bihar State Co-Operative Marketing Union (Biscomaun), Through The Managing Director, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. Null Null 2. The Managing Director (Biscomaun), West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 3. The Senior Regional Officer, Patna Ramandal, Patna (Maharajganj), Patna City. 4. The S.D.O. Patna City.

¶6

The State Of Bihar Through Registrar Cooperative Societies Bihar, Patna.

¶7

.... .... Respondent/s

¶8

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. K.N. Lal, Mr. Samir Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G.-14 Mr. Ishwari Singh

¶9

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-12-2015

¶10

Heard the Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ishwari Singh for the Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union (for short ‘BISCOMAUN’) as well as Mr. Amish Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G.-14 for the State.

¶11

The writ application questions the legality of the order dated 14.8.2012 (Annexure-1) by which the petitioner has been sought to be evicted from the Godown of the BISCOMAUN said to have been leased out to him on the basis of 11 months agreement. The contention of the petitioner is that he is entitled to renewal of the agreement.

¶12

Patna High Court CWJC No.15297 of 2012 dt.11-12-2015

¶13

2/3

¶14

Mr. Ishwari Singh, Counsel for the BISCOMAUN, on the other hand, raises a preliminary objection about the maintainability. Relying on diverse judgments of this Court and lastly the order passed by the Special Bench in the case of the Organizer Dehri C.D. & C.M. Union Limited Vs the State of Bihar & Others [2014(1) PLJR 695] , it has been submitted that the Writ is not maintainable as the BISCOMAUN has been held not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. In such matter, it is submitted, the Writ Court in C.W.J.C. No. 823 of 2015 (Ranjit Kumar vs. Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union ) upheld the preliminary objection of the respondent BISCOMAUN. A copy of the order dated 22.1.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 823 of 2015 has been handed in by him which is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.

¶15

Mr. Amish Kumar appearing for the State points out that the agreement reached between the parties itself contemplates an arbitration clause. If the petitioner has any grievance, the matter could have been agitated before the Arbitrator.

¶16

Having heard the parties and on perusal of the materials on record and the diverse orders placed before me, I am of the considered view that the writ application against the BISCOMAUN for the relief prayed for in this application is not maintainable. The writ application is dismissed.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.15297 of 2012 dt.11-12-2015

¶18

3/3

¶19

Dismissal of the application shall, however, not preclude the petitioner from ventilating his grievance before the appropriate Authority/Forum including filing a suit in the Civil Court for the enforcement of the terms and the conditions of the lease or any other matter related thereto.

¶20

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶21

Pankaj/U

Anil Kumar Bagaria v. Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Biscomaun, through the Managing Director and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Bagaria v. Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Biscomaun, through the Managing Director and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Amrendra Kumar Ojha Vs the Life Insurance Corpn. of I

Mangani Rai Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Umarendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Smriti Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sarvashree Pundra Herbs Vs the Principal Secretary Cum Ch