Allowed

Kameshwar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Feb 2015CR. MISC./5094/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of kidnapping and forcing a minor into marriage under Sections 364 and 34 IPC, subject to a bond and a 12-week relocation condition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail with ₹10,000 bond per person and two sureties, subject to conditions including reporting within 12 weeks.

Kameshwar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5094 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2014 Thana -PARASBIGHA District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== 1. Kameshwar Yadav 2. Baiju Yadav S/o Ramchandra Yadav Both residents of Village - Dumara, P.S. - Dhanarua, Distt - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy No.1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 06-02-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The accusation is of kidnapping the minor son of the informant.

¶5

The victim in 164 Cr. P.C. statement, got his age recorded as 17 years where he stated that he was forcefully taken by Sujit Kumar, being the maternal brother of the informant, by Bolero car in which the petitioners were sitting and then he was forced to marry.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the victim boy filed Matrimonial Suit No. 105 of 2014 for

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5094 of 2015 (2) dt.06-02-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

declaring the marriage null and viold. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ` 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 65 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶11

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶12

Amrendra/-

¶13

U T

Kameshwar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kameshwar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rupesh Roy @ Rupesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitan Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Tasabur Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Lal Babu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Dular Chand Kumar @ Dular Chand Ram Vs The State Of Bihar