Allowed

Ravi Aryan @ Rabi Arjan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Oct 2015CR. MISC./42888/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, an S.D.O., apprehending arrest under sections 285, 304/34 IPC in a criminal case involving alleged death by electric shock during repair work.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within twelve weeks upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Ravi Aryan @ Rabi Arjan Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42888 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2014 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== 1. Ravi Aryan @ Rabi Arjan Son of Sri Rajeshwar Singh, Sub - Divisional Office, North Bihar Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Power Station, Mansha Tola, P.S. - Bettiah Muffasil, District - West Champaran, and resident of village - Barwat Pasrain, P.S. - Bettiah Muffasil, District - West Champaran.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶4

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Roy (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 15-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶6

State.

¶7

The petitioner being the S.D.O. of North Bihar Power Distribution Corporation Limited is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 285, 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The prosecution case is that the husband of the informant being electrician was called by the petitioner through co-accused Mumtaz for doing some electric repairing work. Subsequently, it is alleged that the husband of the informant fell down from the pole due to electric shock and died on the spot.

¶9

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42888 of 2015 (2) dt.15-10-2015

¶11

¶12

petitioner that there is noting on record to show that the husband of the informant was an employee of the Electric Supply Distribution Company. It appears that he was doing some repair work of his own, when he got electrocuted. The Electric Supply and Distribution Company tried to save him and provide medical assistance. There is nothing on record to suggest that the husband of the informant was asked by the petitioner for doing electrical repair work.

¶13

Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 106 of 2014, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶15

P.K./-

¶16

U T

Ravi Aryan @ Rabi Arjan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Aryan @ Rabi Arjan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambha Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anmol Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tabrej Alam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ratan Singh @ Ratan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Parwati Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Uday Rai @ Udan Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar