Disposed

Ratan Singh @ Ratan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Oct 2015CR. MISC./24440/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court transferred the petitioner’s bail application to the lower court, directing the petitioner to surrender within six weeks for the court to decide on regular bail in a sexual offence case involving disputed allegations of attempted ravishment and a pending matrimonial suit.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to surrender within six weeks for the lower court to decide on the prayer for regular bail.

Ratan Singh @ Ratan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24440 of 2015

¶3

	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2015 Thana -KARJA District- MUZAFFARPUR
	====================================================== Ratan Singh @ Ratan Kumar son of Late Govind Singh resident of village- Ranipokhar, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Priyanka Singh, D/o Virendra Singh, Resident of village–Chainpur, Parari, P.S. Karja, District–Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
	Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kr.Singh(App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
03/ 15	-10-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376/511 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner made an attempt to ravish the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner claims to have performed marriage with the informant and has filed Matrimonial Suit No. 311 of 2014 for restitution of conjugal rights, but the informant is not appearing in the matrimonial suit.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24440 of 2015 (3) dt.15-10-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the marriage between the petitioner and the informant has never been performed. The petitioner was on visiting terms with the father of the informant and her photograph and other articles for getting her marriage fixed were taken by the petitioner but the petitioner one day made at attempt to ravish the informant.

¶7

Considering the rival submissions of the parties and the nature of dispute, let the learned court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 27 of 2015 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur.

¶8

With the aforesaid observation, this

¶9

application is disposed of.

¶10

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶11

DKS/-

¶12

U T

Ratan Singh @ Ratan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratan Singh @ Ratan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambha Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anmol Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tabrej Alam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Parwati Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Uday Rai @ Udan Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Aryan @ Rabi Arjan Vs The State Of Bihar