Allowed

Karun Singh @ Karun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2015CR. MISC./35902/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna released the petitioner, President of PACS Ekawana, on anticipatory bail regarding offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, pending trial case No. 161 of 2015 at Udwantnagar P.S., subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail by furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties before C.J.M., Bhojpur, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions, within 12 weeks.

Karun Singh @ Karun Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35902 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2015 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR DistrictBHOJPUR ====================================================== Karun Singh @ Karun Kumar Singh, son of Sri Bishwanath Singh, resident of village- Tetariyan, P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.K. Chourasiya, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-09-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the President of PACS, Ekawana is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The prosecution case is that during the paddy procurement years 2013-14 original documents of the farmers were not tallied with the photo copies, like the land receipt etc.. Subsequently, land receipts were found forged and tampered.

¶4

It is submitted by the learned counsel for

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35902 of 2015 (2) dt.04-09-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

the petitioner that the duty of verifying or tallying the documents was not of the petitioner. Accusation is not specific against the petitioner, who has no criminal antecedent and statement to that effect has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 161 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶9

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶10

Kanchan/-

¶11

U T

Karun Singh @ Karun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karun Singh @ Karun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Abujar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jamaluddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bakuwa Khatoon and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Mukesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Chandra Singh and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.