Allowed

Jamaluddin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC3 Sept 2015CR. MISC./19631/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving Section 498A, 323 IPC, and Dowry Prohibition Act. The bail was contingent upon appearing before the lower court to reconcile with the wife, with confirmation due within one year. Conditions included submission of bail bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on provisional anticipatory bail for one year subject to appearing before the lower court within twelve weeks to reconcile, furnishing bail bonds with two sureties, and confirming bail within

Jamaluddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19631 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -162 Year- 2014 Thana -BIRPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Jamaluddin, Son of Md. Yasin, R/o village – Chhota Babu Jan, P.S. Purna, District – Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Bibi Nafisa Khatoon, Wife of Jamaluddin R/o village – Chhota Babu Jan, P.S. Purna, District – Araria Daughter of Saidur Rahman, R/o village – Kataiya, P.S. Birpur, District - Supaul .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 03-09-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and the complainant. The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case wherein process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The basic accusation is of torture for nonfulfillment of the dowry demand. The marriage between the petitioner and the complainant and birth of five children are admitted facts.

¶3

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19631 of 2015 (03) dt.03-09-2015

¶5

2/3

¶6

petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour, though, no such statement has been made in the petition. It is further submitted that all the children are residing with the petitioner.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that the complainant, who is present in the Court, accepts the offer of the petitioner.

¶8

Both sides agree to appear before the learned court below on 1^st of October, 2015 when the petitioner will take the complainant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour.

¶9

Considering the present stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, District - Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No. 162-C of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶10

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed within one year by the learned court below in three eventualities:- (i) on substantial restoration of the matrimonial

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19631 of 2015 (03) dt.03-09-2015

¶12

3/3

¶13

harmony; (ii) or if the complainant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue; and (iii) or if the complainant fails to appear before the learned court.

¶14

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
DKS/-
U T

Jamaluddin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamaluddin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thakur Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Hareram Mallah @ Hareram Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Abujar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bakuwa Khatoon and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar