Allowed

Uma Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2015CR. MISC./34930/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On 11-09-2015, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Uma Rai in PS Case No. 12/2014 (FI against offences under Sections 366A, 323, 504, 120B IPC). The court relied on the accusation thrust against co-accused Bhola Rai and the absence of medical injury evidence.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail upon surrender or arrest before C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, within 12 weeks, by furnishing bail bond of 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Uma Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34930 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2014 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Uma Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 11-09-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 323, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The accusation is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant. In 164 Cr. P.C. statement, the victim got her age recorded as 14 years when the court also assessed her age as such, though, as per the medical opinion, the victim was found between 19 to 20 years. In 164 Cr. P.C. statement, the victim has stated that she was being kidnapped by co-accused Bhola and was taken to Delhi where after regaining consciousness she found this petitioner and his brother-in-law Manmohan Rai present.

¶4

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the thrust of accusation is against co-accused Bhola who is the

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34930 of 2015 (3) dt.11-09-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

brother of the petitioner and the medical report of the victim does not suggest any injury on the body of the victim.

¶8

Considering the thrust of accusation against the coaccused Bhola Rai, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ` 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 12 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶9

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶10

Amrendra/-

¶11

U T

Uma Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bachchan Mishra @ Ritesh Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Daya Singh @ Daya Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rabin Das @ Roben Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dharmendra Chauhan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramji Singh @ Ramu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar