Allowed

Bachchan Mishra @ Ritesh Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Sept 2015CR. MISC./36607/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous application for regular bail was heard. The petitioner sought regular bail for offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, subject to a conditional surrender within six weeks. The court permitted the petitioner to make corrections in the petition and disposed of the application accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to make corrections in petition; application disposed of directing regular bail subject to surrender within six weeks.

Bachchan Mishra @ Ritesh Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36607 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2014 Thana -SUGAULI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== 1. Bachchan Mishra @ Ritesh Mishra Son of Bagad Mishra resident of village - Sugaon, P.S. Sugauli, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-09-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition, as prayed for. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶3

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 413,414 and 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 11(1)(d)(e)(h)(k) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act.

¶4

The prosecution case is that the informant during patrolling found some persons fighting but as soon as informant reached to the place three persons escaped from the scene. The person found standing there namely Md. Jahid Hussain suggested that he was taking

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36607 of 2015 (2) dt.10-09-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

animals on truck when co accused Pawan Kumar, Satyam Singh and this petitioner snatched five thousand five hundred rupees and were demanding extortion.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the affected persons have not lodged any FIR. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶9

The aforesaid facts constitute ground for

¶10

consideration of the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner by the learned court below in case the petitioner surrenders within six weeks from today in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 68 of 2014 pending in the court of learned CJM, Motihari.

¶11

This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction.

¶12

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶13

Anil/-

¶14

U T

Bachchan Mishra @ Ritesh Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bachchan Mishra @ Ritesh Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bindeshwer Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Shambhu Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Awadhesh Kumar Singh @ Sadhu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Robin @ Robin Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sarfaraz @ MD Sarfaraz Alam Vs The State Of Bihar

Daya Singh @ Daya Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar