Allowed

Ravi Roushan @ Pintu and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Feb 2015CR. MISC./32957/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Prabhat Kumar Jha granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a criminal complaint case involving allegations of theft/loss of vehicle papers, directing them to surrender within four weeks and furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura to be surrendered within four weeks.

Ravi Roushan @ Pintu and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32957 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -169 Year- 2013 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE DistrictMADHEPURA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Ravi Roushan @ Pintu Son of Chandra @ Chandra Kishore Mandal resident of village- Paikpar, Police Station + Anchal Bhargama, DistrictAraria, at Present resident At- Jai Prakash Nagar, Ward No.-06, Madhepura, Police Station + District- Madhepura 2. Avanish Kumar Son of Sadanand Yadav 3. Ankit Kumar Son of Birendra Prasad Yadav Both resident of Ward No. 06, Madhepura, Police Station + DistrictMadhepura

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA

¶6

ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 06-02-2015 Heard both sides.

¶8

The petitioners, namely, Ravi Roushan @ Pintu, Avanish Kumar and Ankit Kumar, apprehend their arrest in Complaint Case No. 169/2013 registered under Section 406 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The complainant alleged that his vehicle was lying in a garage but one day he came to know that the original paper, one blank stamp paper etc. were missing from the vehicle.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant sold the vehicle to the petitioner no. 1 and the petitioners no. 2 and 3 are the witnesses.

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32957 of 2014 (2) dt.06-02-2015

¶12

2/2

¶13

It appears that there is a dispute with regard to sale and purchase of the vehicle as the complainant alleged that a blank stamp paper was stolen but the petitioner no. 1 claimed to have purchased the vehicle from the complainant.

¶14

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Madhepura in Complaint Case No. 169/2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶16

Dilip/-

¶17

U T

Ravi Roushan @ Pintu and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Roushan @ Pintu and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Kumar @ Mantu Kumar @ Mintu and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anup Kumar Srivastava and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotan Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar