Allowed

Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Feb 2015CR. MISC./4917/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the petitioner, a defendant in an IPC 366A, 120B case involving alleged kidnapping. The victim had initially recorded a statement under CrPC 164, revealing discrepancy between her stated and assessed age, indicating prior affection for the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties.

Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4917 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2014 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== 1. Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu S/O Akhilesh Singh Resident of villBahuara,P.S-Deo,Distt.-Aurangabad(Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2015 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under sections 366(A), 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The father of the victim made allegation that the petitioner along with others kidnapped his daughter.

¶2

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the victim appeared in the court and made her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. and she has disclosed her age 17 years. She disclosed that Aklesh Kumar, Kamlesh Singh Mantu Singh and Ram Bichar Singh kidnapped her. Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu the petitioner was also sitting in the Bolero. She further disclosed that on request ,Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu dropped her to the Railway Station. She was not ill behaved. It is further stated that the doctor

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4917 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015

¶4

2/2

¶5

assessed her age to be 19 years. The victim was in love with the petitioner. It appears that the victim did not make any allegation of ill treatment against the petitioner. She simply stated that the petitioner was also sitting in the Bolero.

¶6

Considering the aforesaid facts and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner is in jail since 19.10.2014, the above named petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Deo P.S. Case No. 70 of 2014.

¶7

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶8

M.Rahman/-

¶9

U T

Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar Srivastava Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Irfan Vs The State Of Bihar

Abadh Kishore Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Shrivastava @ Rakesh Kumar Shrivastav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar