Allowed

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Feb 2015CR. MISC./4935/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a cheating case involving recovery of stolen motorcycles. Implicated via confessional statements and recovery from his premises, the petitioner was directed to furnish a bond and sureties on the same footing as co-accused already on bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted. Petitioner to furnish bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount each to the Judicial Magistrate.

Vishal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4935 of 2015 ====================================================== 1. Vishal Kumar Son of Mohan Singh Resident of vill-Prabhunath Nagar,P.S-Chapra,Distt.-Saran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2015 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant apprehended Chandan Singh and Bhushan Kumar Sharma and from their possession stolen motorcycles were recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner is not named in the first information report but on the basis of confessional statement of Chandan Kumar the name of the petitioner figured in the case. It is alleged that one stolen motorcycle bearing registration No. BR-04F-9075 was recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is submitted that from Bhushan Kumar Sharma also one stolen motorcycle was

¶2

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4935 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015

¶3

2/2

¶4

recovered. Pramod Singh and Gaurabh Kumar Singh @ Rana has already been enlarged on bail along with Bhushan Kumar Sharma. On perusal of record it appears that name of the petitioner figured in the confessional statement of Chandan Kumar Singh and from the house of the petitioner one stolen motorcycle bearing Registration No. 6457 was recovered but other accused persons Bhushan Kumar Sharma, Pramod Kumar and Gaurabh Kumar Singh @ Rana have already been enlarged on bail. From possession of Bhushan Kumar stolen motorcycle was recovered. The case of the petitioner stands on same footing.

¶5

Considering the aforesaid fact, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D. Bharti, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chapra in Khaira P.S. Case No. 113 of 2014.

¶6

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶7

M.Rahman/-

¶8

U T

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar Srivastava Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Irfan Vs The State Of Bihar

Abadh Kishore Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Shrivastava @ Rakesh Kumar Shrivastav Vs The State Of Bihar

Saurabh Kumar @ Chintu Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar