Allowed

Sudha Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC11 Aug 2015CR. MISC./32903/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge criminal miscellaneous order granting anticipatory bail to a petitioner accused of cheating and forgery offences. The court granted bail after considering apprehension of arrest arising from a partition dispute involving family property claims.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to be produced before C.J.M, Muzaffarpur within four weeks.

Sudha Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32903 of 2015 (2) dt.11-08-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32903 of 2015

¶3

	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1631 Year- 2014 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
	1. Sudha Devi Wife of Arvind Singh, Resident of Mohallah - Ayachigram Koluha Paigambarpur, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur.
	.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Mahendra Rai, Son of Late Ramcharan Rai resident of village Baigana, P.S. Aurai, District -Muzaffarpur at present r/o mohalla Ayachigram Koluha Paigambarpur, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District -Muzaffarpur.
	.... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
	Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar(App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2	11-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
	State.
	The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a
	case registered for the offences punishable under sections 420,
	467, 471, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
	It is alleged that the complainant being a retired
	teacher had purchased 2 katha 5 dhurs of land in his name and 10
	dhurs land in the name of his daughter Sudha Devi as both were
	residing together. Subsequently, the complainant was asked to
	vacate the land on which the complainant constructed house and
	when the complainant went to circle office he found that the

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32903 of 2015 (2) dt.11-08-2015

¶5

Jamabandi has been created in the name of the petitioner who is

¶6

daughter of the complainant.

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the back ground of partition dispute the accusation has been levelled.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts, the above named petitioner in the vent of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case No. 1631 of 2014, subject

¶9

to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶10

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶11

M.Rahman/U T

Sudha Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudha Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhpato Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Parwez Alam Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Salim Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Zulfakar @ Zalfakar Jabbar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinod Choudhary @ Vinod Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Bharosh Singh @ Ram Bharosh Singh @ Ram Bharosh Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.