Allowed

Dhiraj Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2015CR. MISC./31658/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to four employees accused of murder after a victim fell from a water tank. The petitioners were released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C. within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail to petitioners on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount within four weeks.

Dhiraj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31658 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -394 Year- 2013 Thana -KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMUZAFFARPUR

¶3

====================================================== 1. Dhiraj Kumar son of Upendra Narayan Singh, resident of village – Manajhaul, PS-Cheoriya, Bariyarpur, District-Begusarai.

¶4

1. Anil Kumar son of Radhe-Shyam Bhagat, resident of village Kanti, PSKanti, Muzaffarpur.

¶5

1. Sanad Kumar son of Shyam Nandan Singh, R/o Bharwad, PS-Muffasil, Begusarai.

¶6

Murari Kukmar @ Murari Singh @ Murari Kumar Singh, son of Permanand Singh, R/o village-Bhauirwar, PS-Muffasil, Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjiva Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Roy(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 21-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶8

In this case, petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 394 of 2013 registered for offences under sections 302/ 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

In this case, one Ravindra Paswan, victim was working in the construction of water tank which was constructed by the I.V.R.C.L. Company and from there he had fallen down which led to his death and the present application has been filed on account of death of the victim.

¶10

Petitioners are the employees of the aforesaid

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31658 of 2014 (2) dt.21-01-2015

¶12

2/2

¶13

company.

¶14

In view of the nature of relationship with the aforesaid company, in the event of the petitioners’ arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 394 of 2013 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶15

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶16

Mahesh/-

¶17

U T

Dhiraj Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhiraj Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chunnu Baitha Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Upendra Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Anand Prakash Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Amarnath Kuamr Vs The State Of Bihar

Kumari Pushplata Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Yogendra Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar