Allowed

Kameshwar Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC7 Aug 2015CR. MISC./32243/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a complaint case for cheating and criminal breach of trust, conditional upon arrest within a specified period and furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners must surrender before the learned Court below within 12 weeks, furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ each with two sureties of the like amount.

Kameshwar Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32243 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1382 Year- 2013 Thana -SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSIWAN

¶3

====================================================== 1. Kameshwar Singh 2. Prabhu Singh 3. Om Prakash Singh All are S/o Rajendra Singh Resident of Village Hasua, P.S. Nautan, District Siwan.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Ram Naresh Singh, Advocate S/o Raghunandan Singh R/o Village Dharm Makariabadli, P.S. Siwan (M), District Siwan.

¶5

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganjendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, complainant and the State.

¶6

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 417,504 and 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The prosecution case is that the accused persons took one lac rupees in 2010 for providing dealership of Pepsi cold drinks but neither the dealership was provided nor money was returned.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32243 of 2015 (2) dt.07-08-2015

¶10

2/2

¶11

that the petitioners are relatives of the complainant and there is no proof with regard to the payment of money in 2010. It is further submitted that for the occurrence of 5.1.2010 the complaint was filed on 18.6.2013.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that relying on the petitioner being relative of the complainant, the complainant gave money but he has been cheated by the petitioners.

¶13

Considering the delayed nature of accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Siwan in connection with Complaint Case No. 1382 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶14

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶15

Anil/-

¶16

U T

Kameshwar Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kameshwar Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alok Kumar @ Babloo @ Alok Prayadarshi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arun Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Kumar Jha @ Amit Jha Vs The State Of Bihar

Soni Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Taufique Ahmad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hitesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar