This bench allowed the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner, Md. Sadhab Ahmad, who had already been arrested in PS.Case No. -185 of 2014, and dismissed the application as infructuous.
The anticipatory bail application is permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31105 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2014 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District-
BHAGALPUR
======================================================
Md. Sadhab Ahmad @ Md. Sadhab S/o Md. Sikandar R/o Mohalla-
Tatarpur, P.S. - Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
2 20-01-2015 It is stated that the petitioner has already been arrested
and as such his application has become infructuous.
2. As prayed, the anticipatory bail application is
permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application filed by the arrested petitioner should be permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed.
Md. Sadhab Ahmad @ Md. Sadhab
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
