Petitioner in criminal custody sought bail alleging false implication. Court dismissed the bail petition due to the gravity of the alleged offences, refusing privilege at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39053 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2014 Thana -NASRIGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)
====================================================== Parmeshwar Choudhary son of Jhabhar Choudhary Resident of village - Tetrarh Bangla, P.S. Akorhigola, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 14-01-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
connection with alleged offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120 B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Nasriganj (Rajpur) P.S. Case No.59 of 2014.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Sections 302, 201 and 120 B IPC.
Parmeshwar Choudhary
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
