In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner, who had earlier filed an informatory petition, sought relief from apprehended arrest. The Court dismissed the petition as not maintainable due to the nature of accusations and the statutory bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31089 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2013 Thana -SC/ST P.S. District- SARAN ====================================================== Pramod Kumar Singh S/o Mohan Singh R/o village- Khalpura, Kamala, P.S.- Chapra Mufassil, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
B.T/U T
(Vikash Jain, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition filed by a petitioner who had previously been a complainant is maintainable due to apprehension of arrest under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pramod Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
