The Patna High Court bail application was rejected as the petitioner was found in possession of looted mobile, indicating his involvement in the theft.
Bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30168 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30168 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana - PHULWARI District- PATNA =================================================== Krishna Prasad @ Kirshan Prasad Son of Late Bipat Gope, Resident of Village - Sultanpur, P.S. - Danapur Cant, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 12.08.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the
State.
The Petitioner seeks bail in Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 133 of 2015 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.
Considering that the Petitioner was found to be in possession of the looted mobile, I am not inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under Section 395 IPC who was found in possession of looted property.
Krishna Prasad @ Kirshan Prasad
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
