Allowed

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Aug 2015CR. MISC./29835/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under IPC Sections 324 and 307. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to specified conditions.

Arbind Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29835 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2015 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== 1. Arbind Yadav S/o Raghunandan Yadav village - Barbanna, Ward No. 13, P.S. Raniganj, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kundan Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 12-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 12.02.2015 and has fair antecedent, let the Petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 29 of 2015, G.R. No. 361 of 2015 subject to the conditions,

¶5

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29835 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner,

¶9

That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail,

¶10

That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,

¶11

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

¶12

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶13

Prakash/U T

¶14

(Anjana Prakash, J)

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Bhushan Singh and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Shashi Shekhar @ Shashi Shekhar Bhagat and Ors. Vs Hemant Kumar Singh and Ors.

Billu Kumari and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Kumod Thakur and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Samiullah @ Chand Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Prasad @ Kirshan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar