Allowed

Shailesh Rai @ Shaileshwar Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Jul 2015CR. MISC./26308/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed the petitioner's appeal for provisional anticipatory bail in a Section 498A IPC torture case, granting release for one year subject to conditions regarding matrimonial harmony and complainant's participation.

What did the court decide?

Released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year with a bond and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to specific conditions of harmonious reconciliation.

Shailesh Rai @ Shaileshwar Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26308 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3897 Year- 2014 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

====================================================== 1. Shailesh Rai @ Shaileshwar Rai S/o Nagendra Rai Resident of village - Minapur, Kaunhara Ghat Road, P.S. Town, Hajipur, District - Vaishali

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Reena Devi W/o Shailesh Rai, S/o Nagendra Rai Resident of village - Minapur, Kaunhara Ghat Road, P.S. Town, Hajipur, District - Vaishali, At present Residing at her naiher with father, namely, Umesh Rai village - Eraji Sahwajpur, P.S. Sadar, Hajipur, District - Vaishali

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar(App)

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and

¶12

the State.

¶13

The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which processes were directed to be issued after cognizance being taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The basic accusation is of torture.

¶15

The petitioner admits his marriage with the complainant. On instructions, it is submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26308 of 2015 (2) dt.17-07-2015

¶17

2/3

¶18

full dignity and honour. Statement to the aforesaid effect has been made in paragraph no. 11 of the petition which reads as follows:

¶19

“That, the petitioner, being a responsible husband, is ready to keep and maintain the complainant/wife with dignity and honour, safety and security.”

¶20

Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 3897 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶21

Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance the petitioner will take the complainant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour.

¶22

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be

¶23

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26308 of 2015 (2) dt.17-07-2015

¶24

3/3

¶25

confirmed by the learned court below in three eventualities – (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored or (ii) if the complainant fails to appear before the learned court below or (iii) if the complainant deliberately gets reluctant to reconcile the issue.

¶26

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶27

Anil/U T

Shailesh Rai @ Shaileshwar Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Rai @ Shaileshwar Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Kumar Yadav and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chhotu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Imamuddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajij Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Suraj @ Sipahi @ Sipahi Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.