Krishna Das v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court confirmed the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 1085C of 2012 and ordered an increase in the monthly deposit payable to the opposite party from Rs.750 to Rs.1,500.
What did the court decide?
Confirmation of provisional anticipatory bail on same terms; increase monthly deposit to Rs.1,500.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2579 of 2015 (3) dt.19-08-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2579 of 2015
Arising Out of Complaint Case No. -1085C Year- 2012 District- JAMUI ====================================================== Krishna Das S/o Late Musho Das Resident of Village Madhukunda, Near Kaliguri, Kamla Asthan Sansthapur, P.O. Madhukund, P.S. Sadhuri, District Bardwan (West Bengal). .... .... Petitioner/s
====================================================== Krishna Das S/o Late Musho Das Resident of Village Madhukunda, Near Kaliguri, Kamla Asthan Sansthapur, P.O. Madhukund, P.S. Sadhuri, District Bardwan (West Bengal).
Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sunita Devi D/o Krishna Das Resident of Village Bojhayat, P.S. Sono, District Jamui. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
.... .... Opposite Party/s
3 19-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner was allowed Provisional anticipatory bail by the order dated 22.1.2015.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to confirmation of provisional anticipatory bail granted on 22.1.2015
Whether the fine payable to the opposite party should be increased
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Krishna Das
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Sunita Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court