Disposed

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Aug 2015CR. MISC./50252/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR alleging vexatious prosecution. The court declined to interfere with the investigation but directed the Investigating Officer to conclude the case against the petitioner within three months due to delays marked as an old case.

What did the court decide?

Investigating Officer directed to conclude investigation against petitioner within three months; quashing of FIR denied.

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50252 of 2012 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1184 Year- 2011 Thana -null District- - =========================================================== Akhileshwar Prasad Singh S/o Sri Parsuram Singh, resident of village + P.O. Karma, P.S. Karakat, District Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. H.A. Khan, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-08-2015

¶3

The Petitioner seeks quashing of the First Information Report of Sasaram (Mufasil) P.S. case No.1184 of 2011 pending in

¶4

the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram on the ground that it is vexatious prosecution.

¶5

A report was called for from the Officer Incharge, Sasaram (Mufasil) with regard to the present status of investigation, which has been received. From it, it appears that charge sheet has already been submitted as against eight persons, whereas the investigation appears to be going on as against the present Petitioner.

¶6

Since the investigation should be rarely interfered with, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶7

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation positively as against the Petitioner also within a period

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50252 of 2012 dt.18-08-2015

¶9

2/2

¶10

of three months from the date of receipt of this order, since it is an old

¶11

case.

¶12

With the aforesaid observations, the application stands disposed of.

¶13

Let this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram through FAX at the cost of the Petitioner for its onward transmission to the Investigating Officer in connection with Sasaram (Mufasil) P.S. case No.1184 of 2011 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶14

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶15

Narendra/-

¶16

U T

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amir Chandra Sahni @ Bigul Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Himanshu Bhushan Narayan Vs the State of Bihar

Jagdeep Prasad Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

L. Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Yogendra Prasad Advocate Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Braj Kishore Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.