Allowed

Anand Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC2 Jul 2015CR. MISC./25567/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a rice miller accused of cheating due to non-supply of customs milled rice. The bail is subject to the deposit of 20% of the alleged defalcated amount within five months.

What did the court decide?

Provisional anticipatory bail granted for six months, subject to deposit of 20% of the alleged amount within five months and surrender within 12 weeks.

Anand Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Money Laundering | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25567 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2015 Thana -PAUTHU District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== 1. Anand Kumar Singh S/o Bharat Singh R/o Village- Balihari, P.O.Luka, P.S.- Pauthu, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies , Corporation Ltd. Aurangabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lal Bahadur Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner being rice miller was supplied 4898 quintals of paddy by the Aurangabad unit of Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation under agreement for the agriculture year 2012-13 against which the petitioner was supposed to supply 3281.70 quintals of Custom Milled Rice(CMR) but the petitioner only supplied 810 quintals of Custom Milled Rice and failed to supply 2471.70 quintals of custom milled rice worth Rs. 53, 52, 528/-

¶4

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25567 of 2015 (2) dt.02-07-2015

¶6

2/3

¶7

petitioner that custom milled rice was not supplied due to the latches on the part of the authorities of the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation. The agreement stipulates recovery of due amount through initiation of certification proceeding under Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914. The certificate proceeding has already been initiated. Moreover the petitioner has already deposited Rs. 2,00,000/-.

¶8

It is submitted by Mr. A.N.Rai, learned counsel for the Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation that within the stipulated period the CMR rice were not supplied and now the Food Corporation of India has decided not to accept the rice.

¶9

The petitioner is ready to deposit 20% of the alleged defalcated amount within a period of five months through bank draft before Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation. The said 20% amount will include Rs.2,00,000/already deposited by the petitioner.

¶10

Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No. 13 of 2015, subject to

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25567 of 2015 (2) dt.02-07-2015

¶12

3/3

¶13

the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned Court below on deposit of 20% of the alleged due amount after deducting Rs. 2,00,000/- already deposited.

¶14

The aforesaid deposit will be subject to the certificate proceeding.

¶15

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/-

¶16

U T

Anand Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Brijnandan Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Yadav @ Mangal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahamatulla @ Md. Rahmatulla @ Md. Rahmat Vs The State Of Bihar

Bihari Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Noor Jahan Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar